Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-20 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is much better than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra's 72.2 general score. The Google Pixel 4 body is thinner and way lighter than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, even though it was released only 15 months before. Google Pixel 4 features a slightly better looking screen than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because it has a quite bigger display, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2280 resolution.
Google Pixel 4 features a little bit better hardware performance than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra. They have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores. Google Pixel 4 has a much better camera than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has a lot worse 12.2 MP resolution back camera and a lower (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB. The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 61% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.