Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-20 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is much better than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra's score of 72.2. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a has newer 11 version while Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has Android 10, so it provides a lot of extra features. The Google Pixel 4a is a incredibly lighter and noticeably thinner cellphone than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, although both were only released 5 months apart.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has a little better processing power than Google Pixel 4a. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores. The Google Pixel 4a and Kyocera DuraForce Ultra both have similar displays, although the Google Pixel 4a also has a bit greater screen pixel density, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bigger display.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Google Pixel 4a captures much clearer photos and videos than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower 12.2 MP resolution and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 43% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.