Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-01-20 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 439 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is a bit better than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, having a general score of 77.7 against 72.2. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version and Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has Android 10. The HTC One M9 is an much older device than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, but HTC was able to build it a lot lighter and much thinner anyway.
The HTC One M9 has a little better processing power than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a GPU and a 64 bits CPU. The HTC One M9 has a much better display than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better display pixel density.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has a much greater storage to install applications and games than HTC One M9, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a very superior battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 58 percent larger battery size.
HTC One M9 counts with a better camera than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, although it has a camera in the back with lesser MP resolution, a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.