Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-20 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Power has an overall score of 76.1, which is a bit better than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra's general score of 72.2. These devices have Android operating system, but the Motorola Moto G Power has 11 version while Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has Android 10 version, counting with a couple nice extra features and optimized performance. The Motorola Moto G Power design is a lot thinner and extremely lighter than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, even though it was released around 9 months before.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has 2 GB more RAM. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a bit better looking screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola Moto G Power captures better photographs and videos than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels back facing camera and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light situations.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Moto G Power features a little better battery duration than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.