Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-20 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| -- | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is much better than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, having an 86.2 score against 72.2. Moto G200 5G's body is newer, much thinner and a lot lighter than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra. These phones use Android operating system, but Moto G200 5G has newer 11 version while Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has Android 10, providing a couple additional features.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch. Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G captures greater videos and photos than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a superior memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Moto G200 5G counts with a little better battery duration than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.