Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-20 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is better than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, with a score of 80 against 72.2. Despite of the fact that the Motorola One Zoom is older than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, it's design is extremely lighter and extremely thinner. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little greater number of pixels in each inch of display.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a bit superior processor than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has more RAM memory. Motorola One Zoom counts with a much better camera than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Zoom also has a larger camera aperture to take better low light images and videos and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a bit superior battery duration than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.