Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-20 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A30 is better than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, getting a global score of 79.6 against 72.2. Although Samsung Galaxy A30 is older than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, it's design is thinner and way lighter. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixels quantity per inch in the display.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has a bit superior processor than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has more RAM. The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A30 takes better photographs and videos than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has a much lower (Full HD) video resolution and a much worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A30, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.