Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-20 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is much better than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, with an 83.8 score against 72.2. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is an older phone than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, but it is incredibly lighter and thinner anyway. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has more RAM.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density. The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A50, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a superior camera than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a back camera with a better 25 mega pixels resolution and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and video.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.