Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-01-20 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is way better than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, getting a 91.3 score against 72.2. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has Android 10 version, so it offers a lot of extra features. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a incredibly thinner and lighter cellphone than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, even when they were released only a couple of months apart.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel density. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Both have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures way better photos and videos than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, and although they both have the same video quality, the same video frame rate and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a camera with lot more mega-pixels. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra and Galaxy A52 5G have incredibly similar storage for games and applications, both have a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB and exactly the same internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a battery performance that's just as good as the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.