Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-20 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is better than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, with an 85.2 score against 72.2. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is a lot older than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, it's design is notably thinner and incredibly lighter. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels count per inch of screen.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 (2018). Both have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a way better camera than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a 24 mega pixels camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a bigger aperture.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has a little bit better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.