Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-20 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| -- | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra's 72.2 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy F62 body is much lighter and notably thinner than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, even though they were only released 1 months apart. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy F62 has a more recent 11 version while Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has Android 10, so it counts with some extra features and performance optimizations.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has 4 more cpu cores. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a little sharper screen than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy F62 captures much better videos and photos than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a camera with a much higher 64 MP resolution. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra and Samsung Galaxy F62 both feature quite similar memory for games and applications, both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB and the same 128 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much longer battery life than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.