Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-01-20 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30 has an overall score of 82.4, which is much better than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra's global score of 72.2. Galaxy M30's body is a lot thinner and much lighter than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, despite of the fact that it was released only 23 months before. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Galaxy M30 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has Android 10.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a bit better display than Galaxy M30, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M30. They have the same RAM amount and 8 processing cores.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has just a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy M30 counts with just a bit better camera than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, although it has a much worse video quality, a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and a back facing camera with a much worse 13 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy M30 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.