Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-20 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 439 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is way better than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, getting a overall score of 87.7 against 72.2. Both phones in this review have the same Android 10 OS. Even when Galaxy M51 and Kyocera DuraForce Ultra were released with only 4 months difference, Galaxy M51 is notably lighter and way thinner.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M51. They have 6 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has a slightly better screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixels amount in each display inch.
Samsung Galaxy M51 takes a lot better photos and videos than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same video frame rates and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a back camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution. The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M51, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy M51 features a really longer battery performance than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.