Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is much better than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, with an 81 score against 72.2. Galaxy XCover Pro is an older phone than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, but Samsung managed to make it way thinner and lighter. Both devices in our current comparison include Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has Android 10, so it counts with a lot of extra features.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy XCover Pro takes much better videos and photos than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger aperture and a more MP back facing camera.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.