Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-20 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is a lot better than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, getting a overall score of 88.5 against 72.2. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version and Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has Android 10, offering lots of additional features. The Galaxy Z Flip is an older phone than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, but it's much thinner and notably lighter anyway.
Galaxy Z Flip has just a little better processing power than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and Kyocera DuraForce Ultra feature incredibly similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit inferior pixel amount in each inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a larger screen.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a superior camera than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, although it has a much less mega-pixels back-facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, they both have the same diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.