Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-20 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, getting a general score of 94.6 against 72.2. These devices come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has Android 10, so it gives a couple nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is a little bit heavier but thinner than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, and both of them were only released 4 months apart.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot smaller display and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better performance than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures a lot better photographs and videos than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, although it has a worse (4K) video quality and a way lower resolution back facing camera, they both have a same size aperture. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a battery life that is very similar to the battery performance in Kyocera DuraForce Ultra.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.