Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-20 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| -- | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is much better than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, getting an 82.9 score against 72.2. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has Android 10 version, so it gives some additional features. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro body is notably thinner and extremely lighter than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, although it was released just a little over a year before.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a little bit better screen than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has a camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.