Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-20 | 2020-10-01 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 7.62 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T is a lot better than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, with a global score of 87.9 against 72.2. The Xiaomi Mi 10T construction is way thinner and incredibly lighter than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, even when both of them were released only 4 months apart. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System).
The Xiaomi Mi 10T features a bit superior CPU than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Mi 10T has a little more vivid screen than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bigger display.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with a way better camera than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, it also counts with a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10T, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T has just a bit longer battery duration than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.