Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-20 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is much better than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, getting a overall score of 81.4 against 72.2. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE construction is a lot lighter and noticeably thinner than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, although it was released around a year before. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has 9.0 Pie version and Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has Android 10 version, counting with lots of additional features and enhanced performance.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a bit more vivid screen than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit bigger display. The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's processing unit is very similar to the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra one, both have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a very superior camera than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has a way better resolution camera.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a way better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 47 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.