Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-20 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Plastic | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T is better than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, having an 82.2 score against 72.2. The Xiaomi Mi 9T design is notably thinner and incredibly lighter than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, even though it was released just a little more than a year before. Both of these devices come with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding operating system features.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a bit more vivid display than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bigger display.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a way better camera than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also has a camera with a much higher resolution. The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features much more storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 13% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.