Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-20 | 2016-05-17 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Max is a little bit better than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, getting a global score of 77.5 against 72.2. Xiaomi Mi Max's construction is way thinner and extremely lighter than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a bit higher 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Max, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi Max takes better pictures and videos than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, although it has a worse video definition, a camera with way less mega pixels and a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting images and video in poorly lited situations.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a better memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Mi Max has a little better battery performance than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because it has an 8% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.