Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-20 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a score of 83, which is much better than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra's 72.2 global score. These phones come with the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is a noticeably lighter and way thinner phone than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, although both of them were released with only 0 months difference.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a processing unit that is just as good as the CPU in Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit better count of pixels per inch of display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T takes a lot better pictures and videos than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has a back camera with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a little better battery life than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.