Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | -- |
| 2016-01-08 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.57 x 3.40 x 0.55 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 10.08 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 258 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8928 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.37 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is way better than Kyocera DuraForce XD's 57.6 global score. Samsung Galaxy A50 is a extremely newer device, and it's also incredibly thinner and much lighter than Kyocera DuraForce XD. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much better looking display than Kyocera DuraForce XD, because it has a way greater amount of pixels per inch of display, a little larger display and a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Galaxy A50 counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Kyocera DuraForce XD, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A50 features a bit more powerful processor than Kyocera DuraForce XD, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
Galaxy A50 counts with a much better camera than Kyocera DuraForce XD, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A50 also has a back camera with much more MP. Galaxy A50 has a bit superior battery lifetime than Kyocera DuraForce XD, because it has an 8% bigger battery size.
The Galaxy A50 costs a bit more than the Kyocera DuraForce XD, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.