Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 50.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | |
| 2017-09-29 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.21 x 2.22 x 0.99 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 164.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 154 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 8909 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 304 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1530mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.36 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is much better than the Kyocera DuraXV LTE, getting a general score of 80 against 50.8. The Google Pixel 3 design is newer, much thinner and lighter than the Kyocera DuraXV LTE. The Google Pixel 3 features an incredibly better looking screen than Kyocera DuraXV LTE, because it has much more pixels per inch of screen, a much bigger display and a way better 1080 x 2160 resolution.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a faster CPU than Kyocera DuraXV LTE, because it has more RAM memory and 4 more cores. The Google Pixel 3 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Kyocera DuraXV LTE, because it has a lot higher resolution camera and a lot better video resolution. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a superior memory to store more apps and games than Kyocera DuraXV LTE, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 3 features a superior battery duration than Kyocera DuraXV LTE, because it has a 2915mAh battery capacity instead of 1530mAh.
Google Pixel 3 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.