Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 50.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Samsung |
| 2017-09-29 | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.21 x 2.22 x 0.99 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 164.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 154 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 8909 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 304 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1530mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a global score of 83.3, which is way better than Kyocera DuraXV LTE's 50.8 general score. The Galaxy S9 is a notably thinner and just a little bit lighter phone than the Kyocera DuraXV LTE, even when both were only released 6 months apart. Galaxy S9 has a more powerful processing unit than Kyocera DuraXV LTE, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more cores.
The Galaxy S9 has an incredibly better screen than Kyocera DuraXV LTE, because it has a much better 1440 x 2960 resolution, a much better pixel density and a really bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy S9 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Kyocera DuraXV LTE, because it has a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Galaxy S9 features a very superior storage for games and applications than Kyocera DuraXV LTE, because it has more internal memory and an external memory card slot that supports up to 400 GB. Galaxy S9 counts with a way better battery performance than Kyocera DuraXV LTE, because it has a 96% larger battery capacity.
Galaxy S9 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.