Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Samsung |
| Android 4.3 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.19 x 2.57 x 0.43 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 210.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8212 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1,5 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.05 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 13.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is way better than the Kyocera Hydro Life, getting an 83.8 score against 54. The Samsung Galaxy A50 construction is somewhat heavier but notably thinner than the Kyocera Hydro Life. The Galaxy A50 has a superior performance than Kyocera Hydro Life, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and more RAM.
Galaxy A50 features a little more vivid display than Kyocera Hydro Life, because it has a way bigger screen, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a way better screen density. The Galaxy A50 has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Kyocera Hydro Life, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Kyocera Hydro Life, because it has a way better 1920x1080 video resolution and a way more MP camera in the back. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Kyocera Hydro Life, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2000mAh.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy A50 is also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.