Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3 | -- |
| 2014-05-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.02 x 2.50 x 0.43 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.90 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM8926 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1,5 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 193 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is a lot better than Kyocera Hydro VIBE's 53.8 general score. Even though Google Pixel 3 is just a bit heavier than the Kyocera Hydro VIBE, it's way thinner and incredibly newer. Google Pixel 3 features a better looking display than Kyocera Hydro VIBE, because it has a much better 1080 x 2160px resolution, a lot greater pixels quantity per inch of screen and a larger screen.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a superior CPU than Kyocera Hydro VIBE, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and they are faster). The Google Pixel 3 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Kyocera Hydro VIBE, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a way better battery life than Kyocera Hydro VIBE, because it has 2915mAh of battery capacity instead of 2000mAh. The Google Pixel 3 shoots much better photographs and videos than Kyocera Hydro VIBE, because it has a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Google Pixel 3 is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.