Compare phones
Motorola DROID Turbo
32 GB Metalized Fiber| Global Score | |
| 53.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2014-05-05 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.02 x 2.50 x 0.43 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.42 inches |
| 4.90 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Gray and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM8926 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 1,5 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.62 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 3.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 193 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is much better than the Kyocera Hydro VIBE, with a 76.4 score against 53.8. Although the Motorola DROID Turbo and the Kyocera Hydro VIBE were released with only 6 months difference, Motorola DROID Turbo's construction is heavier but a little bit thinner than the Kyocera Hydro VIBE. These devices include Android OS, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has a more recent 4.4.4 version while Kyocera Hydro VIBE has Android 4.4.2 version, so it counts with some extra features.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a lot better looking screen than Kyocera Hydro VIBE, because it has a larger display, a lot higher count of pixels per inch of screen and a lot better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a more powerful processor than Kyocera Hydro VIBE, and although they both have a Quad-Core CPU, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has a larger amount of RAM memory and a much better 500 MHz graphics processor.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Kyocera Hydro VIBE, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Motorola DROID Turbo captures much clearer photos and videos than Kyocera Hydro VIBE, because it has a lot higher 20.7 MP resolution camera and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a way better battery lifetime than Kyocera Hydro VIBE, because it has a 95 percent greater battery size.
Motorola DROID Turbo not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the Kyocera Hydro VIBE, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.