Search


Compare phones

Global Score
44.364.8
Basic Information
KyoceraNokia
Android 4.0Android 9.0 Pie
2012-05-082019-06-10
4.53 x 2.44 x 0.50 inches6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches
4.23 ounces5.50 ounces
BlackBlack
--Metal and Plastic
Scratch-Resistant GlassScratch-Resistant Glass
$ 89.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
3.5 inches5.5 inches
320 x 480 pixels 1440 x 720 pixels
IPS LCDIPS LCD
165 pixels per inch293 pixels per inch
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
6.57.3
Performance
Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8655 chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset
Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processorARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor
512 MB (500 MHz) RAM2 GB RAM
Adreno 205 (enhanced) GPUAdreno 504 GPU
7.388.73
Storage
2 GB internal memory32 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotmicroSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot
1.98.12
Camera
3.20 MP8.00 MP + 5.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
--1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
5.178.47
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
Mobile HotspotMobile Hotspot
EV-DO A and CDMALTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA
--Nano SIM
3.26.1
Battery Life
1500mAh Li-Ion Battery2990mAh Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
8.4 hours talk time--
3.284.96
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 5.0
GPSGPS
Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity SensorAccelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor
--FM Radio

Comparison review

Nokia 3.1 A has a score of 64.8, which is way better than Kyocera Hydro's 44.3 global score. Both phones in this review use Android OS, but Nokia 3.1 A has newer 9.0 Pie version and Kyocera Hydro has Android 4.0 version, so it provides you some nice extra features and optimized performance. Even though the Nokia 3.1 A is incredibly heavier than the Kyocera Hydro, it's way thinner and newer.

The Nokia 3.1 A features a better looking display than Kyocera Hydro, because it has a much larger display, much more pixels per display inch and a way better resolution of 720 x 1440. The Nokia 3.1 A counts with a much bigger storage for apps and games than Kyocera Hydro, because it has 32 GB internal storage.

The Nokia 3.1 A has a better hardware performance than Kyocera Hydro, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and more RAM memory. Nokia 3.1 A shoots greater photographs and videos than Kyocera Hydro, because it has a camera with lot more megapixels. The Nokia 3.1 A features a much better battery lifetime than Kyocera Hydro, because it has a 2990mAh battery size against 1500mAh.

The Nokia 3.1 A costs a bit more money than Kyocera Hydro, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.