Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 27.4 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Nokia |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2006-04-05 | 2019-06-10 |
| 3.50 x 1.80 x 1.00 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.00 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 89.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 5.5 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| -- | 293 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| -- | 2 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 5.76 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 4.51 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 0.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 163 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 3.1 A is a lot better than the Kyocera K822, with a overall score of 64.8 against 27.4. Nokia 3.1 A's design is a lot newer and a lot thinner than Kyocera K822's, but it's also much heavier. Nokia 3.1 A counts with a very superior performance than Kyocera K822, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster).
Nokia 3.1 A features a much better looking screen than Kyocera K822, because it has a lot higher resolution of 720 x 1440. Nokia 3.1 A has a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Kyocera K822. Nokia 3.1 A counts with a very superior camera than Kyocera K822, because it has a camera in the back with a lot higher 8 mega pixels resolution.
The Nokia 3.1 A counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Kyocera K822, because it has a 199% more battery capacity.
Nokia 3.1 A costs a bit more than the Kyocera K822, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.