Search


Compare phones

Global Score
25.842.3
Basic Information
KyoceraHTC
--Windows Mobile Standard 6.1
2005-08-092009-06-25
3.54 x 1.89 x 0.98 inches4.50 x 2.50 x 0.50 inches
3.90 ounces3.70 ounces
$ 70.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
128 x 128 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
--TFT
--167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
36
processor Single-Core 528 MHz processor
--192 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.66
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
Camera
0.30 MP2.00 MP
3.634.73
Networks
--Wi-Fi
CDMAEV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA
--SIM
0.12.9
Battery Life
900mAh Li-Ion Battery1500mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
170 hours standby time
3.5 hours talk time
324 hours standby time
4.8 hours talk time
2.43.28
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
--GPS

Comparison review

HTC Ozone has a score of 42.3, which is much better than the Kyocera KX16 Candid's general score of 25.8. The HTC Ozone design is a lot newer, extremely thinner and just a little lighter than Kyocera KX16 Candid. HTC Ozone counts with a lot better looking display than Kyocera KX16 Candid, because it has a much better 240 x 320 resolution.

HTC Ozone has a superior performance than Kyocera KX16 Candid, because it has more CPU cores. HTC Ozone takes much clearer photos and videos than Kyocera KX16 Candid, because it has a lot higher 2 megapixels resolution back-facing camera. The Kyocera KX16 Candid and the HTC Ozone have incredibly similar memory capacity to store more apps and games.

HTC Ozone features a superior battery lifetime than Kyocera KX16 Candid, because it has 1500mAh of battery capacity instead of 900mAh.

The HTC Ozone and the Kyocera KX16 Candid cost exactly the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.