Search


Compare phones

Global Score
25.843.5
Basic Information
KyoceraNokia
2005-08-092012-02-27
3.54 x 1.89 x 0.98 inches4.54 x 2.32 x 0.53 inches
3.90 ounces3.74 ounces
--Black, Blue, Gray, Red and Yellow
$ 70.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
128 x 128 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
--TFT
--167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
36.2
processor Single-Core 1000 MHz processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.767.29
Storage
--102,4 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
01.92
Camera
0.30 MP3.20 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
3.635.5
Networks
--Wi-Fi
CDMAHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
--SIM
0.13.6
Battery Life
900mAh Li-Ion Battery1430mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
170 hours standby time
3.5 hours talk time
707 hours standby time
9 hours talk time
2.43.2
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.1, EDR

Comparison review

The Nokia Asha 302 is a lot better than Kyocera KX16 Candid, getting a global score of 43.5 against 25.8. Nokia Asha 302's body is noticeably newer, a bit lighter and noticeably thinner than the Kyocera KX16 Candid. Nokia Asha 302 counts with a lot better display than Kyocera KX16 Candid, because it has a much better 240 x 320 resolution.

Nokia Asha 302 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Kyocera KX16 Candid, because it has a larger number of cores. The Nokia Asha 302 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Kyocera KX16 Candid, because it has a camera in the back with lot more MP. The Nokia Asha 302 has a much greater storage for games and applications than Kyocera KX16 Candid, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 32 GB.

The Nokia Asha 302 counts with a superior battery duration than Kyocera KX16 Candid, because it has a 1430mAh battery size.

Nokia Asha 302 and the Kyocera KX16 Candid cost exactly the same, making it a very good choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.