Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.5 | 24.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Motorola |
| 2006-09-13 | 2006-04-04 |
| 3.39 x 1.73 x 0.83 inches | 3.30 x 1.81 x 0.82 inches |
| 3.28 ounces | 2.99 ounces |
| $ 90.00 | $ 75.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| 101 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 180 hours standby time 3.7 hours talk time | 212 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.32 |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
The Motorola W315 is slightly better than the Kyocera Marbl, getting a 24.7 score against 24.5. The Motorola W315 is a a bit lighter and a little bit thinner phone than the Kyocera Marbl, even when they were released with only a couple months difference. The Motorola W315 has a processor that is just as good as Kyocera Marbl's processor, they have 0 cores.
The Kyocera Marbl counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola W315, although it has a quite lower resolution of 128 x 128. The Motorola W315's camera is very similar to Kyocera Marbl's camera. Motorola W315 features as much memory capacity for applications and games as the Kyocera Marbl one. Kyocera Marbl has a little better battery life than Motorola W315, because it has a 900mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the Motorola W315 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.