Search


Compare phones

Global Score
24.560.4
Basic Information
KyoceraSamsung
--Android 4.2
2006-09-132014-03-15
3.39 x 1.73 x 0.83 inches5.24 x 2.60 x 0.38 inches
3.28 ounces4.90 ounces
--Black and White
$ 90.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
--4.5 inches
128 x 128 pixels 540 x 960 pixels
--TFT
101 pixels per inch245 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
57.8
processor Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor
--1 GB RAM
GPUYes GPU
5.768.1
Storage
--8 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
04.62
Camera
--5.00 MP + 0.30 MP
--1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
05.94
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
CDMAHSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
--Micro SIM
0.14.6
Battery Life
900mAh Li-Ion Battery2100mAh Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
180 hours standby time
3.7 hours talk time
--
2.44
Other Features
--Bluetooth 4.0, EDR
GPSGPS
--Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

Galaxy S3 Slim is a lot better than the Kyocera Marbl, with a 60.4 score against 24.5. The Galaxy S3 Slim is a a lot newer and notably thinner phone than Kyocera Marbl, but it is also incredibly heavier. The Galaxy S3 Slim counts with a much better screen than Kyocera Marbl, because it has a lot higher resolution of 960 x 540 and a way greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.

The Galaxy S3 Slim has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Kyocera Marbl, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 32 GB. The Galaxy S3 Slim features a way better processing power than Kyocera Marbl, because it has a higher number of cores. Galaxy S3 Slim takes a lot better videos and photos than Kyocera Marbl.

The Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim features a much longer battery lifetime than Kyocera Marbl, because it has 2100mAh of battery capacity.

The Galaxy S3 Slim and the Kyocera Marbl cost the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.