Search


Compare phones

Global Score
33.143.5
Basic Information
KyoceraNokia
2011-02-022012-02-27
3.70 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches4.54 x 2.32 x 0.53 inches
3.00 ounces3.74 ounces
BlackBlack, Blue, Gray, Red and Yellow
$ 70.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
1.8 inches2.4 inches
--320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
LCDTFT
839 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
8.86.2
processor Single-Core 1000 MHz processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.767.29
Storage
--102,4 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
01.92
Camera
0.30 MP3.20 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
3.635.5
Networks
--Wi-Fi
CDMAHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
--SIM
0.13.6
Battery Life
920mAh Li-Ion Battery1430mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
300 hours standby time
4.2 hours talk time
707 hours standby time
9 hours talk time
2.483.2
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.1, EDR

Comparison review

The Nokia Asha 302 is much better than Kyocera S2100, with a global score of 43.5 against 33.1. Nokia Asha 302 is a newer and extremely thinner cellphone than the Kyocera S2100, but it's also somewhat heavier. Kyocera S2100 has a way better screen than Nokia Asha 302, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a lot better number of pixels per inch of screen.

The Nokia Asha 302 counts with a way better processing power than Kyocera S2100, because it has a larger number of faster cores. Nokia Asha 302 counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Kyocera S2100, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 32 GB.

Nokia Asha 302 features a much better camera than Kyocera S2100, because it has a way more MP back-facing camera. The Nokia Asha 302 features a much better battery lifetime than Kyocera S2100, because it has a 55% larger battery capacity.

The Nokia Asha 302 and the Kyocera S2100 cost exactly the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.