Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 31.7 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Nokia |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-06-14 |
| 4.06 x 2.60 x 0.59 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 3.49 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black | White |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 70.00 | $ 70.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 182 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| -- | 2 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 5.76 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 4.51 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 0.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 920mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 225 hours standby time 4.2 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 3.1 C has a score of 64.8, which is a lot better than Kyocera S2300 Torino's 31.7 overall score. Nokia 3.1 C is a notably heavier but incredibly thinner cellphone than the Kyocera S2300 Torino. Nokia 3.1 C has a sharper display than Kyocera S2300 Torino, because it has a much larger screen, a way greater count of pixels per inch in the display and a lot higher 720 x 1440 resolution.
The Nokia 3.1 C has a much greater processing power than Kyocera S2300 Torino, because it has more processing cores. Nokia 3.1 C takes way better pictures and videos than Kyocera S2300 Torino, because it has a camera in the back with a way higher 8 mega-pixels resolution. The Nokia 3.1 C features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Kyocera S2300 Torino, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 128 GB.
Nokia 3.1 C has a much better battery lifetime than Kyocera S2300 Torino, because it has 2990mAh of battery capacity instead of 920mAh.
The Nokia 3.1 C and the Kyocera S2300 Torino cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.