Compare phones
Kyocera TNT
S2400Samsung M400
SPH-M400| Global Score | |
| 25.9 | 39.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Samsung |
| 2008-04-01 | 2012-10-15 |
| 3.53 x 1.78 x 0.66 inches | 3.84 x 1.99 x 0.72 inches |
| 2.56 ounces | 3.70 ounces |
| $ 65.00 | $ 65.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | 2.4 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| STN | LCD |
| 114 pixels per inch | 167 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.3 | 5.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm QSC6155 chipset |
| processor | Single-Core 480 MHz processor |
| -- | 128 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 6.57 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 1.30 MP |
| 0 | 4.51 |
| CDMA | -- |
| 0.1 | 0 |
| Battery Life | |
| 700mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 2.08 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.2 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
The Samsung M400 has a global score of 39.5, which is much better than Kyocera TNT's global score of 25.9. Samsung M400 is a a lot newer phone than Kyocera TNT, although it's a little thicker and noticeably heavier. The Samsung M400 counts with a better processor than Kyocera TNT, because it has a higher number of cores.
The Samsung M400 features a brighter display than Kyocera TNT, because it has a much better 320 x 240 resolution, a much larger display and a higher pixels amount per inch in the screen. The Samsung M400 features a very superior camera than Kyocera TNT. The Samsung M400 counts with as much memory to store more apps and games as the Kyocera TNT.
Samsung M400 counts with a superior battery duration than Kyocera TNT, because it has a 1000mAh battery size.
Samsung M400 costs the same than Kyocera TNT, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.