Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.5 | 25.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Motorola |
| -- | 2008-01-07 |
| -- | 3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches |
| -- | 3.30 ounces |
| $ 155.00 | $ 100.00 |
| -- | 128 x 128 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| 220 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| EDGE and GPRS | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 450 hours standby time 9 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.48 |
Comparison review
The Motorola W270 is just a bit better than LAVA 3G 402+, having a 25.6 score against 24.5. Motorola W270's processor is very similar to the LAVA 3G 402+ one, both have the same number of cores. LAVA 3G 402+ features a much better screen than Motorola W270. The LAVA 3G 402+ and the Motorola W270 both feature very similar storage to install games and applications.
LAVA 3G 402+ and Motorola W270 count with quite similar cameras. The Motorola W270 has a way better battery duration than LAVA 3G 402+.
The Motorola W270 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.