Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.5 | 24.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Motorola |
| -- | 2006-04-04 |
| -- | 3.30 x 1.81 x 0.82 inches |
| -- | 2.99 ounces |
| $ 155.00 | $ 75.00 |
| -- | 128 x 160 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| 220 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| EDGE and GPRS | CDMA |
| 0.4 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 212 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.32 |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
The Motorola W315 has an overall score of 24.7, which is slightly better than the LAVA 3G 402+'s 24.5 score. The Motorola W315 and LAVA 3G 402+ count with similar processors, they have a 0-Core processing unit. The LAVA 3G 402+ has a much more vibrant display than Motorola W315. Motorola W315 features a camera that's very similar to the camera in LAVA 3G 402+.
LAVA 3G 402+ and Motorola W315 feature incredibly similar memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos. Motorola W315 features a very superior battery performance than LAVA 3G 402+.
Motorola W315 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.