Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.5 | 26 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Nokia |
| -- | 2005-06-03 |
| -- | 4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches |
| -- | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 155.00 | $ 100.00 |
| -- | 96 x 68 pixels |
| 220 pixels per inch | 65 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6 | 4.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| EDGE and GPRS | GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.4 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 450 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.4 |
Comparison review
Nokia 1600 is just a bit better than LAVA 3G 402+, having a overall score of 26 against 24.5. The LAVA 3G 402+ has a lot better looking screen than Nokia 1600, because it has a much higher screen pixel density. The Nokia 1600's CPU is very similar to LAVA 3G 402+'s processor, they have a 0-Core processor.
The Nokia 1600 and LAVA 3G 402+ feature extremely similar cameras. Nokia 1600's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as the LAVA 3G 402+ one. Nokia 1600 has a way better battery life than LAVA 3G 402+.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Nokia 1600 is also a lot cheaper, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.