Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 30.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | |
| -- | 2019-10-24 |
| 4.72 x 1.87 x 0.52 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 3.53 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 240 x 400 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 179 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| -- | 6 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 2 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 220 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.4 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is a lot better than LAVA A 16's 30.9 score. The Google Pixel 4 body is incredibly thinner but way heavier than the LAVA A 16. Google Pixel 4 counts with a way better screen than LAVA A 16, because it has a way larger display, a much greater screen density and a way better 1080 x 2280px resolution.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a really superior hardware performance than LAVA A 16, because it has more CPU cores. The Google Pixel 4 captures much better photographs and videos than LAVA A 16, because it has a much more megapixels camera. Google Pixel 4 has much more storage to install applications and games than LAVA A 16, although it has no SD card slot.
The Google Pixel 4 has a much longer battery duration than LAVA A 16, because it has a 211 percent bigger battery size.
The Google Pixel 4 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.