Search


Compare phones

LAVA A 16
Global Score
30.933.9
Basic Information
LavaNokia
--2008-11-04
4.72 x 1.87 x 0.52 inches4.23 x 1.84 x 0.58 inches
3.53 ounces3.10 ounces
$ 349.00$ 245.00
Display / Screen
2.6 inches2 inches
240 x 400 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
--TFT
179 pixels per inch200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.96.3
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--30,72 MB internal memory
microSD (up to 2 GB) external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
0.440.4
Camera
3.20 MP2.00 MP
5.064.73
EDGE, GPRS and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIM, Dual SIMSIM
0.40.3
Battery Life
900mAh Li-Ion Battery1020mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
220 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
288 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
2.42.64
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 2.0
FM Radio--

Comparison review

The Nokia 5130 XpressMusic is a bit better than the LAVA A 16, having a score of 33.9 against 30.9. The Nokia 5130 XpressMusic is a lighter but thicker device than LAVA A 16. The Nokia 5130 XpressMusic counts with a processing unit that is just as good as the processing unit in LAVA A 16, both have 0 processing cores.

The Nokia 5130 XpressMusic features a bit more vivid screen than LAVA A 16, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 320 x 240 pixels and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display. LAVA A 16 features a slightly better camera than Nokia 5130 XpressMusic, because it has a much more megapixels camera.

The LAVA A 16 has a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Nokia 5130 XpressMusic. Nokia 5130 XpressMusic features improved battery life than LAVA A 16, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.

Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Nokia 5130 XpressMusic is also very cheap compared to the other ones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.