Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 30.9 | 33.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Sony |
| -- | 2006-02-28 |
| 4.72 x 1.87 x 0.52 inches | 3.90 x 1.70 x 0.70 inches |
| 3.53 ounces | 3.20 ounces |
| $ 349.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.6 inches | -- |
| 240 x 400 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 179 pixels per inch | 102 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.9 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 28,67 MB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 2 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.44 | 0.3 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 1.30 MP |
| 5.06 | 4.51 |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 750mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 220 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 360 hours standby time 7 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Sony Ericsson K510 is slightly better than the LAVA A 16, getting a score of 33.6 against 30.9. The Sony Ericsson K510 design is just a little bit lighter but a lot thicker than the LAVA A 16. The LAVA A 16 counts with a better looking screen than Sony Ericsson K510, because it has a much higher resolution of 400 x 240 pixels and a much better number of pixels per inch of display.
The Sony Ericsson K510's processor is just as good as LAVA A 16's processor, both of them have the same number of cores. LAVA A 16 features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Sony Ericsson K510, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 2 GB. LAVA A 16 counts with better battery performance than Sony Ericsson K510, because it has 900mAh of battery capacity.
The LAVA A 16 has a superior camera than Sony Ericsson K510, because it has a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Sony Ericsson K510 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.