Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 41.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 4.47 x 2.38 x 0.49 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.17 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 2.9 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 244 hours standby time 11.8 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.12 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a lot better than the LAVA Iris 350, with a score of 80.7 against 41.3. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a newer 5.0 version while LAVA Iris 350 has Android 4.4.2, giving a couple additional features and performance optimizations. Samsung Galaxy Note 3's construction is a lot thinner but heavier than the LAVA Iris 350.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much better looking screen than LAVA Iris 350, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a much bigger screen and a much greater display pixel density. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than LAVA Iris 350, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 64 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a very superior processing unit than LAVA Iris 350, because it has more cores, a much better graphics processor running at 600 MHz and a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a very superior camera than LAVA Iris 350, because it has a way more mega pixels back camera.
Galaxy Note 3 has a much longer battery life than LAVA Iris 350, because it has a 129% more battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy Note 3 is also cheap compared to the other phone, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.