Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.5 | 25.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Motorola |
| -- | 2008-01-07 |
| -- | 3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches |
| -- | 3.30 ounces |
| $ 155.00 | $ 100.00 |
| -- | 128 x 128 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| 220 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| EDGE and GPRS | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 450 hours standby time 9 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.48 |
Comparison review
The Motorola W270 is just a bit better than the LAVA Iris 354e, getting a score of 25.6 against 24.5. The Motorola W270 has a processing unit that's just as good as LAVA Iris 354e's processing unit, both have a 0-Core processing unit. LAVA Iris 354e has a much better looking screen than Motorola W270.
The Motorola W270's camera is just as good as LAVA Iris 354e's camera. Motorola W270 has as much storage capacity to store more apps and games as the LAVA Iris 354e. The Motorola W270 features a much better battery lifetime than LAVA Iris 354e.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Motorola W270 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.