Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.5 | 24.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Motorola |
| -- | 2006-04-04 |
| -- | 3.30 x 1.81 x 0.82 inches |
| -- | 2.99 ounces |
| $ 155.00 | $ 75.00 |
| -- | 128 x 160 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| 220 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| EDGE and GPRS | CDMA |
| 0.4 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 212 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.32 |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
The Motorola W315 is a little bit better than LAVA Iris 354e, having a global score of 24.7 against 24.5. Motorola W315's processor is just as good as the CPU in LAVA Iris 354e, both of them have a 0-Core CPU. LAVA Iris 354e counts with a much sharper display than Motorola W315. Motorola W315 has a camera that is very similar to LAVA Iris 354e's camera.
Motorola W315 has as much storage capacity for games and applications as the LAVA Iris 354e. The Motorola W315 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than LAVA Iris 354e.
The Motorola W315 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.