Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.5 | 26 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Nokia |
| -- | 2005-06-03 |
| -- | 4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches |
| -- | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 155.00 | $ 100.00 |
| -- | 96 x 68 pixels |
| 220 pixels per inch | 65 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6 | 4.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| EDGE and GPRS | GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.4 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 450 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.4 |
Comparison review
The Nokia 1600 has an overall score of 26, which is a little bit better than LAVA Iris 354e's overall score of 24.5. Nokia 1600's processor is very similar to the LAVA Iris 354e one, they have a 0-Core processing unit. LAVA Iris 354e has a much better looking display than Nokia 1600, because it has a way greater display pixels density.
Nokia 1600's memory for apps and games is just as good as LAVA Iris 354e's one. The Nokia 1600's camera is just as good as the LAVA Iris 354e one. Nokia 1600 counts with a really longer battery performance than LAVA Iris 354e.
The Nokia 1600 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.