Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 44.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Samsung |
| Android 4.4 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.00 x 2.54 x 0.37 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 7.92 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 2.9 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 250 hours standby time 11.2 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.12 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 80.7, which is a lot better than the LAVA Iris 400 Colour's 44.9 global score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 3 has newer 5.0 version and LAVA Iris 400 Colour has Android 4.4. The Galaxy Note 3 has a greater hardware performance than LAVA Iris 400 Colour, because it has a much better graphics co-processor working at 600 MHz, a higher number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 3 has a much sharper display than LAVA Iris 400 Colour, because it has a much bigger screen, a lot more pixels per inch of display and a lot higher 1920 x 1080 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a very superior memory to store more games and applications than LAVA Iris 400 Colour, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that supports up to 64 GB.
Galaxy Note 3 takes a lot better pictures and videos than LAVA Iris 400 Colour, because it has a back camera with a lot higher resolution. The Galaxy Note 3 features a much better battery life than LAVA Iris 400 Colour, because it has a 129 percent larger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also the cheapest, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.