Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 43.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.92 x 2.52 x 0.39 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.74 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 2 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.22 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.17 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 150 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a general score of 83.3, which is way better than the LAVA Iris 404e's score of 43.1. Samsung Galaxy S9's design is way heavier but somewhat thinner than LAVA Iris 404e. Galaxy S9 has a much more powerful CPU than LAVA Iris 404e, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
Galaxy S9 counts with a much better display than LAVA Iris 404e, because it has a lot higher pixels count per inch of screen, a lot larger display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. The Galaxy S9 has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than LAVA Iris 404e, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 400 GB and 64 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a superior battery lifetime than LAVA Iris 404e, because it has a 114 percent bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy S9 takes a lot better videos and photos than LAVA Iris 404e, because it has a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy S9 costs a little more than the LAVA Iris 404e, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.