| Global Score | |
| 48.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Samsung |
| Android 4.4 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 4.88 x 2.54 x 0.41 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.5 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1700mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.52 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 80.7, which is way better than the LAVA Iris 406Q's score of 48.2. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has newer 5.0 version while LAVA Iris 406Q has Android 4.4 version, so it provides the user a couple additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a bit more powerful processor than LAVA Iris 406Q, because it has more RAM memory, a faster graphics processing unit running at 600 megahertz and a greater number of cores. Galaxy Note 3 features a sharper display than LAVA Iris 406Q, because it has a lot better 1920 x 1080 resolution, a way larger screen and a way better pixel density.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a way bigger memory for applications and games than LAVA Iris 406Q, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 64 GB and 60 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 takes a lot better photos and videos than LAVA Iris 406Q, because it has a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy Note 3 features a very superior battery duration than LAVA Iris 406Q, because it has an 88 percent larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy Note 3 is also cheaper, which makes it an easy decision.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.